Final Team Statistics
ALL GAMES - through 2006-07
SCORING OFFENSE ## Team G W-L Pts Avg/G -------------------------------------------- 1.Point Park.......... 31 29-2 2881 92.9 2.Mt. Vernon Nazarene. 32 25-7 2708 84.6 3.Malone.............. 33 19-14 2774 84.1 4.Cedarville.......... 31 23-8 2593 83.6 5.Walsh............... 34 28-6 2744 80.7 6.Rio Grande.......... 30 11-19 2396 79.9 7.Notre Dame.......... 33 19-14 2613 79.2 8.Geneva.............. 30 14-16 2307 76.9 9.Wilberforce......... 23 9-14 1734 75.4 10.Ohio Dominican...... 31 15-16 2291 73.9 11.Urbana.............. 29 8-21 2124 73.2 12.Shawnee State....... 30 16-14 2189 73.0 13.Roberts Wesleyan.... 30 16-14 2183 72.8 14.Daemen.............. 29 12-17 2108 72.7 15.Houghton............ 25 9-16 1805 72.2 16.Tiffin.............. 27 5-22 1631 60.4 SCORING DEFENSE ## Team G Pts Avg/G -------------------------------------- 1.Walsh............... 34 2330 68.5 2.Daemen.............. 29 2071 71.4 3.Mt. Vernon Nazarene. 32 2314 72.3 4.Geneva.............. 30 2180 72.7 5.Ohio Dominican...... 31 2274 73.4 6.Shawnee State....... 30 2215 73.8 7.Roberts Wesleyan.... 30 2217 73.9 8.Houghton............ 25 1868 74.7 9.Wilberforce......... 23 1724 75.0 10.Cedarville.......... 31 2360 76.1 11.Tiffin.............. 27 2070 76.7 12.Point Park.......... 31 2385 76.9 13.Malone.............. 33 2599 78.8 14.Notre Dame.......... 33 2620 79.4 15.Urbana.............. 29 2304 79.4 16.Rio Grande.......... 30 2466 82.2 SCORING MARGIN ## Team G OFF DEF Margin ---------------------------------------------- 1.Point Park.......... 31 92.9 76.9 +16.0 2.Mt. Vernon Nazarene. 32 84.6 72.3 +12.3 3.Walsh............... 34 80.7 68.5 +12.2 4.Cedarville.......... 31 83.6 76.1 +7.5 5.Malone.............. 33 84.1 78.8 +5.3 6.Geneva.............. 30 76.9 72.7 +4.2 7.Daemen.............. 29 72.7 71.4 +1.3 8.Ohio Dominican...... 31 73.9 73.4 +0.5 9.Wilberforce......... 23 75.4 75.0 +0.4 10.Notre Dame.......... 33 79.2 79.4 -0.2 11.Shawnee State....... 30 73.0 73.8 -0.9 12.Roberts Wesleyan.... 30 72.8 73.9 -1.1 13.Rio Grande.......... 30 79.9 82.2 -2.3 14.Houghton............ 25 72.2 74.7 -2.5 15.Urbana.............. 29 73.2 79.4 -6.2 16.Tiffin.............. 27 60.4 76.7 -16.3 FREE THROW PERCENTAGES ## Team G FTM FTA Pct --------------------------------------------- 1.Ohio Dominican...... 31 467 618 .756 2.Mt. Vernon Nazarene. 32 526 698 .754 3.Malone.............. 33 627 834 .752 4.Point Park.......... 31 618 855 .723 5.Roberts Wesleyan.... 30 452 632 .715 6.Notre Dame.......... 33 420 600 .700 7.Geneva.............. 30 498 715 .697 8.Walsh............... 34 447 657 .680 9.Shawnee State....... 30 452 667 .678 10.Cedarville.......... 31 428 639 .670 11.Houghton............ 25 299 451 .663 12.Rio Grande.......... 30 399 607 .657 13.Urbana.............. 29 331 507 .653 14.Daemen.............. 29 415 661 .628 15.Wilberforce......... 23 267 429 .622 16.Tiffin.............. 27 289 505 .572 FIELD GOAL PERCENTAGES ## Team G FG FGA Pct --------------------------------------------- 1.Point Park.......... 31 1037 2034 .510 2.Geneva.............. 30 820 1669 .491 3.Mt. Vernon Nazarene. 32 952 1955 .487 4.Notre Dame.......... 33 983 2027 .485 5.Walsh............... 34 1001 2069 .484 6.Malone.............. 33 952 1971 .483 7.Shawnee State....... 30 783 1662 .471 8.Ohio Dominican...... 31 842 1804 .467 9.Wilberforce......... 23 676 1450 .466 10.Cedarville.......... 31 946 2068 .457 11.Rio Grande.......... 30 888 2000 .444 12.Roberts Wesleyan.... 30 800 1819 .440 13.Houghton............ 25 634 1476 .430 14.Daemen.............. 29 731 1711 .427 15.Tiffin.............. 27 620 1495 .415 16.Urbana.............. 29 798 1927 .414 FIELD GOAL PCT DEFENSE ## Team G FG FGA Pct --------------------------------------------- 1.Point Park.......... 31 854 2088 .409 2.Cedarville.......... 31 871 2073 .420 3.Mt. Vernon Nazarene. 32 894 2114 .423 4.Geneva.............. 30 762 1771 .430 5.Roberts Wesleyan.... 30 823 1906 .432 6.Walsh............... 34 865 2001 .432 7.Wilberforce......... 23 555 1262 .440 8.Shawnee State....... 30 763 1719 .444 9.Notre Dame.......... 33 935 2103 .445 10.Daemen.............. 29 746 1674 .446 11.Malone.............. 33 948 2127 .446 12.Ohio Dominican...... 31 843 1843 .457 13.Rio Grande.......... 30 876 1884 .465 14.Houghton............ 25 685 1455 .471 15.Tiffin.............. 27 754 1588 .475 16.Urbana.............. 29 857 1780 .481 3-POINT FIELD GOAL PERCENTAGES ## Team G FG FGA Pct --------------------------------------------- 1.Mt. Vernon Nazarene. 32 278 685 .406 2.Houghton............ 25 238 596 .399 3.Walsh............... 34 295 740 .399 4.Notre Dame.......... 33 227 575 .395 5.Ohio Dominican...... 31 140 369 .379 6.Malone.............. 33 243 650 .374 7.Daemen.............. 29 231 619 .373 8.Shawnee State....... 30 171 460 .372 9.Point Park.......... 31 189 527 .359 10.Geneva.............. 30 169 478 .354 11.Wilberforce......... 23 115 330 .348 12.Rio Grande.......... 30 221 646 .342 13.Cedarville.......... 31 273 819 .333 14.Roberts Wesleyan.... 30 131 436 .300 15.Tiffin.............. 27 102 359 .284 16.Urbana.............. 29 197 700 .281 3-POINT FIELD GOAL PCT DEFENSE ## Team G FG FGA Pct --------------------------------------------- 1.Cedarville.......... 31 183 571 .320 2.Mt. Vernon Nazarene. 32 222 671 .331 3.Ohio Dominican...... 31 204 613 .333 4.Roberts Wesleyan.... 30 217 646 .336 5.Point Park.......... 31 301 886 .340 6.Daemen.............. 29 155 454 .341 7.Rio Grande.......... 30 212 604 .351 8.Notre Dame.......... 33 270 767 .352 9.Geneva.............. 30 209 590 .354 10.Malone.............. 33 261 736 .355 11.Wilberforce......... 23 149 418 .356 12.Walsh............... 34 201 563 .357 13.Urbana.............. 29 183 512 .357 14.Houghton............ 25 144 394 .365 15.Tiffin.............. 27 213 571 .373 16.Shawnee State....... 30 243 644 .377 REBOUNDING OFFENSE ## Team G Reb Avg/G -------------------------------------- 1.Cedarville.......... 31 1418 45.7 2.Point Park.......... 31 1385 44.7 3.Roberts Wesleyan.... 30 1223 40.8 4.Mt. Vernon Nazarene. 32 1274 39.8 5.Walsh............... 34 1320 38.8 6.Rio Grande.......... 30 1162 38.7 7.Geneva.............. 30 1122 37.4 8.Notre Dame.......... 33 1231 37.3 9.Wilberforce......... 23 857 37.3 10.Malone.............. 33 1208 36.6 11.Urbana.............. 29 1038 35.8 12.Shawnee State....... 30 1067 35.6 13.Houghton............ 25 886 35.4 14.Ohio Dominican...... 31 1088 35.1 15.Tiffin.............. 27 937 34.7 16.Daemen.............. 29 960 33.1 REBOUNDING DEFENSE ## Team G Reb Avg/G -------------------------------------- 1.Walsh............... 34 1090 32.1 2.Geneva.............. 30 973 32.4 3.Shawnee State....... 30 987 32.9 4.Point Park.......... 31 1046 33.7 5.Ohio Dominican...... 31 1054 34.0 6.Houghton............ 25 891 35.6 7.Roberts Wesleyan.... 30 1070 35.7 8.Mt. Vernon Nazarene. 32 1150 35.9 9.Wilberforce......... 23 831 36.1 10.Tiffin.............. 27 982 36.4 11.Notre Dame.......... 33 1202 36.4 12.Malone.............. 33 1229 37.2 13.Cedarville.......... 31 1173 37.8 14.Rio Grande.......... 30 1184 39.5 15.Daemen.............. 29 1152 39.7 16.Urbana.............. 29 1192 41.1 REBOUNDING MARGIN ## Team G TEAM Avg OPP Avg Margin -------------------------------------------------------- 1.Point Park.......... 31 1385 44.7 1046 33.7 +10.9 2.Cedarville.......... 31 1418 45.7 1173 37.8 +7.9 3.Walsh............... 34 1320 38.8 1090 32.1 +6.8 4.Roberts Wesleyan.... 30 1223 40.8 1070 35.7 +5.1 5.Geneva.............. 30 1122 37.4 973 32.4 +5.0 6.Mt. Vernon Nazarene. 32 1274 39.8 1150 35.9 +3.9 7.Shawnee State....... 30 1067 35.6 987 32.9 +2.7 8.Wilberforce......... 23 857 37.3 831 36.1 +1.1 9.Ohio Dominican...... 31 1088 35.1 1054 34.0 +1.1 10.Notre Dame.......... 33 1231 37.3 1202 36.4 +0.9 11.Houghton............ 25 886 35.4 891 35.6 -0.2 12.Malone.............. 33 1208 36.6 1229 37.2 -0.6 13.Rio Grande.......... 30 1162 38.7 1184 39.5 -0.7 14.Tiffin.............. 27 937 34.7 982 36.4 -1.7 15.Urbana.............. 29 1038 35.8 1192 41.1 -5.3 16.Daemen.............. 29 960 33.1 1152 39.7 -6.6 BLOCKED SHOTS ## Team G Blocks Avg/G ----------------------------------------- 1.Mt. Vernon Nazarene. 32 185 5.78 2.Cedarville.......... 31 129 4.16 3.Geneva.............. 30 117 3.90 4.Notre Dame.......... 33 126 3.82 5.Daemen.............. 29 88 3.03 6.Ohio Dominican...... 31 90 2.90 7.Urbana.............. 29 83 2.86 8.Point Park.......... 31 87 2.81 9.Houghton............ 25 70 2.80 10.Malone.............. 33 85 2.58 11.Wilberforce......... 23 55 2.39 12.Walsh............... 34 80 2.35 13.Shawnee State....... 30 65 2.17 14.Rio Grande.......... 30 64 2.13 15.Roberts Wesleyan.... 30 61 2.03 16.Tiffin.............. 27 51 1.89 ASSISTS ## Team G Assists Avg/G ------------------------------------------ 1.Point Park.......... 31 514 16.58 2.Geneva.............. 30 496 16.53 3.Notre Dame.......... 33 531 16.09 4.Walsh............... 34 535 15.74 5.Roberts Wesleyan.... 30 468 15.60 6.Mt. Vernon Nazarene. 32 499 15.59 7.Ohio Dominican...... 31 468 15.10 8.Cedarville.......... 31 452 14.58 9.Houghton............ 25 357 14.28 10.Rio Grande.......... 30 427 14.23 11.Malone.............. 33 464 14.06 12.Urbana.............. 29 391 13.48 13.Daemen.............. 29 378 13.03 14.Wilberforce......... 23 294 12.78 15.Tiffin.............. 27 322 11.93 16.Shawnee State....... 30 348 11.60 STEALS ## Team G Steals Avg/G ----------------------------------------- 1.Rio Grande.......... 30 284 9.47 2.Daemen.............. 29 270 9.31 3.Wilberforce......... 23 212 9.22 4.Urbana.............. 29 247 8.52 5.Point Park.......... 31 245 7.90 6.Tiffin.............. 27 213 7.89 7.Shawnee State....... 30 209 6.97 8.Malone.............. 33 228 6.91 9.Roberts Wesleyan.... 30 207 6.90 10.Mt. Vernon Nazarene. 32 219 6.84 11.Geneva.............. 30 202 6.73 12.Ohio Dominican...... 31 201 6.48 13.Notre Dame.......... 33 209 6.33 14.Houghton............ 25 149 5.96 15.Walsh............... 34 199 5.85 16.Cedarville.......... 31 167 5.39 TURNOVER MARGIN ## Team G TEAM Avg OPP Avg Margin -------------------------------------------------------- 1.Daemen.............. 29 454 15.7 565 19.5 +3.83 2.Urbana.............. 29 367 12.7 422 14.6 +1.90 3.Rio Grande.......... 30 500 16.7 533 17.8 +1.10 4.Walsh............... 34 414 12.2 449 13.2 +1.03 5.Wilberforce......... 23 407 17.7 429 18.7 +0.96 6.Ohio Dominican...... 31 407 13.1 428 13.8 +0.68 7.Malone.............. 33 448 13.6 444 13.5 -0.12 8.Mt. Vernon Nazarene. 32 425 13.3 421 13.2 -0.12 9.Point Park.......... 31 460 14.8 450 14.5 -0.32 10.Shawnee State....... 30 500 16.7 455 15.2 -1.50 11.Houghton............ 25 417 16.7 379 15.2 -1.52 12.Notre Dame.......... 33 475 14.4 412 12.5 -1.91 13.Geneva.............. 30 529 17.6 449 15.0 -2.67 14.Cedarville.......... 31 464 15.0 371 12.0 -3.00 15.Tiffin.............. 27 493 18.3 405 15.0 -3.26 16.Roberts Wesleyan.... 30 524 17.5 424 14.1 -3.33 ASSIST/TURNOVER RATIO ## Team G Asst Avg Turn Avg Ratio -------------------------------------------------------- 1.Walsh............... 34 535 15.7 414 12.2 1.29 2.Mt. Vernon Nazarene. 32 499 15.6 425 13.3 1.17 3.Ohio Dominican...... 31 468 15.1 407 13.1 1.15 4.Notre Dame.......... 33 531 16.1 475 14.4 1.12 5.Point Park.......... 31 514 16.6 460 14.8 1.12 6.Urbana.............. 29 391 13.5 367 12.7 1.07 7.Malone.............. 33 464 14.1 448 13.6 1.04 8.Cedarville.......... 31 452 14.6 464 15.0 0.97 9.Geneva.............. 30 496 16.5 529 17.6 0.94 10.Roberts Wesleyan.... 30 468 15.6 524 17.5 0.89 11.Houghton............ 25 357 14.3 417 16.7 0.86 12.Rio Grande.......... 30 427 14.2 500 16.7 0.85 13.Daemen.............. 29 378 13.0 454 15.7 0.83 14.Wilberforce......... 23 294 12.8 407 17.7 0.72 15.Shawnee State....... 30 348 11.6 500 16.7 0.70 16.Tiffin.............. 27 322 11.9 493 18.3 0.65 OFFENSIVE REBOUNDS ## Team G No. Avg/G --------------------------------------- 1.Cedarville.......... 31 471 15.19 2.Point Park.......... 31 447 14.42 3.Wilberforce......... 23 326 14.17 4.Roberts Wesleyan.... 30 397 13.23 5.Rio Grande.......... 30 387 12.90 6.Urbana.............. 29 368 12.69 7.Walsh............... 34 431 12.68 8.Mt. Vernon Nazarene. 32 402 12.56 9.Shawnee State....... 30 365 12.17 10.Tiffin.............. 27 328 12.15 11.Houghton............ 25 297 11.88 12.Malone.............. 33 389 11.79 13.Notre Dame.......... 33 388 11.76 14.Daemen.............. 29 332 11.45 15.Geneva.............. 30 343 11.43 16.Ohio Dominican...... 31 346 11.16 DEFENSIVE REBOUNDS ## Team G No. Avg/G --------------------------------------- 1.Cedarville.......... 31 947 30.55 2.Point Park.......... 31 938 30.26 3.Roberts Wesleyan.... 30 826 27.53 4.Mt. Vernon Nazarene. 32 872 27.25 5.Walsh............... 34 889 26.15 6.Geneva.............. 30 779 25.97 7.Rio Grande.......... 30 775 25.83 8.Notre Dame.......... 33 843 25.55 9.Malone.............. 33 819 24.82 10.Ohio Dominican...... 31 742 23.94 11.Houghton............ 25 589 23.56 12.Shawnee State....... 30 702 23.40 13.Urbana.............. 29 670 23.10 14.Wilberforce......... 23 531 23.09 15.Tiffin.............. 27 609 22.56 16.Daemen.............. 29 628 21.66 3-POINT FIELD GOALS MADE ## Team G 3FG Avg/G --------------------------------------- 1.Houghton............ 25 238 9.52 2.Cedarville.......... 31 273 8.81 3.Mt. Vernon Nazarene. 32 278 8.69 4.Walsh............... 34 295 8.68 5.Daemen.............. 29 231 7.97 6.Rio Grande.......... 30 221 7.37 7.Malone.............. 33 243 7.36 8.Notre Dame.......... 33 227 6.88 9.Urbana.............. 29 197 6.79 10.Point Park.......... 31 189 6.10 11.Shawnee State....... 30 171 5.70 12.Geneva.............. 30 169 5.63 13.Wilberforce......... 23 115 5.00 14.Ohio Dominican...... 31 140 4.52 15.Roberts Wesleyan.... 30 131 4.37 16.Tiffin.............. 27 102 3.78