Final Team Statistics
AMC GAMES ONLY - through 2006-07
SCORING OFFENSE ## Team G W-L Pts Avg/G -------------------------------------------- 1.Point Park.......... 10 9-1 865 86.5 2.Mt. Vernon Nazarene. 18 15-3 1476 82.0 Cedarville.......... 18 15-3 1476 82.0 4.Malone.............. 18 7-11 1453 80.7 5.Notre Dame.......... 10 8-2 785 78.5 6.Rio Grande.......... 18 6-12 1407 78.2 7.Walsh............... 18 15-3 1403 77.9 8.Geneva.............. 10 3-7 752 75.2 9.Daemen.............. 10 4-6 744 74.4 10.Wilberforce......... 18 5-13 1311 72.8 11.Shawnee State....... 18 10-8 1295 71.9 12.Roberts Wesleyan.... 10 5-5 716 71.6 13.Urbana.............. 18 3-15 1286 71.4 14.Ohio Dominican...... 18 9-9 1267 70.4 15.Houghton............ 10 1-9 701 70.1 16.Tiffin.............. 18 5-13 1124 62.4 SCORING DEFENSE ## Team G Pts Avg/G -------------------------------------- 1.Walsh............... 18 1211 67.3 2.Mt. Vernon Nazarene. 18 1283 71.3 3.Daemen.............. 10 723 72.3 4.Ohio Dominican...... 18 1306 72.6 5.Shawnee State....... 18 1310 72.8 6.Cedarville.......... 18 1319 73.3 Tiffin.............. 18 1319 73.3 8.Notre Dame.......... 10 740 74.0 9.Point Park.......... 10 763 76.3 10.Wilberforce......... 18 1374 76.3 11.Roberts Wesleyan.... 10 766 76.6 12.Geneva.............. 10 772 77.2 13.Malone.............. 18 1437 79.8 14.Houghton............ 10 799 79.9 15.Urbana.............. 18 1462 81.2 16.Rio Grande.......... 18 1477 82.1 SCORING MARGIN ## Team G OFF DEF Margin ---------------------------------------------- 1.Mt. Vernon Nazarene. 18 82.0 71.3 +10.7 2.Walsh............... 18 77.9 67.3 +10.7 3.Point Park.......... 10 86.5 76.3 +10.2 4.Cedarville.......... 18 82.0 73.3 +8.7 5.Notre Dame.......... 10 78.5 74.0 +4.5 6.Daemen.............. 10 74.4 72.3 +2.1 7.Malone.............. 18 80.7 79.8 +0.9 8.Shawnee State....... 18 71.9 72.8 -0.8 9.Geneva.............. 10 75.2 77.2 -2.0 10.Ohio Dominican...... 18 70.4 72.6 -2.2 11.Wilberforce......... 18 72.8 76.3 -3.5 12.Rio Grande.......... 18 78.2 82.1 -3.9 13.Roberts Wesleyan.... 10 71.6 76.6 -5.0 14.Urbana.............. 18 71.4 81.2 -9.8 15.Houghton............ 10 70.1 79.9 -9.8 16.Tiffin.............. 18 62.4 73.3 -10.8 FREE THROW PERCENTAGES ## Team G FTM FTA Pct --------------------------------------------- 1.Ohio Dominican...... 18 284 369 .770 2.Malone.............. 18 343 447 .767 3.Mt. Vernon Nazarene. 18 295 398 .741 4.Point Park.......... 10 185 257 .720 5.Notre Dame.......... 10 132 189 .698 6.Shawnee State....... 18 273 392 .696 7.Roberts Wesleyan.... 10 147 212 .693 8.Walsh............... 18 265 389 .681 9.Geneva.............. 10 147 216 .681 10.Rio Grande.......... 18 246 377 .653 11.Urbana.............. 18 215 335 .642 12.Houghton............ 10 103 162 .636 13.Daemen.............. 10 131 210 .624 14.Cedarville.......... 18 225 362 .622 15.Wilberforce......... 18 181 304 .595 16.Tiffin.............. 18 200 344 .581 FIELD GOAL PERCENTAGES ## Team G FG FGA Pct --------------------------------------------- 1.Notre Dame.......... 10 291 586 .497 2.Mt. Vernon Nazarene. 18 520 1069 .486 3.Point Park.......... 10 313 644 .486 4.Walsh............... 18 500 1065 .469 5.Wilberforce......... 18 519 1118 .464 6.Malone.............. 18 488 1052 .464 7.Shawnee State....... 18 462 1006 .459 8.Geneva.............. 10 270 589 .458 9.Cedarville.......... 18 544 1204 .452 10.Ohio Dominican...... 18 451 1018 .443 11.Rio Grande.......... 18 517 1222 .423 12.Roberts Wesleyan.... 10 258 611 .422 13.Tiffin.............. 18 428 1018 .420 14.Daemen.............. 10 264 635 .416 15.Houghton............ 10 252 608 .414 16.Urbana.............. 18 475 1184 .401 FIELD GOAL PCT DEFENSE ## Team G FG FGA Pct --------------------------------------------- 1.Cedarville.......... 18 486 1205 .403 2.Notre Dame.......... 10 262 629 .417 3.Point Park.......... 10 275 654 .420 4.Mt. Vernon Nazarene. 18 505 1200 .421 5.Walsh............... 18 461 1063 .434 6.Shawnee State....... 18 454 1027 .442 7.Wilberforce......... 18 433 966 .448 8.Daemen.............. 10 257 573 .449 9.Ohio Dominican...... 18 495 1094 .452 10.Roberts Wesleyan.... 10 286 632 .453 11.Malone.............. 18 521 1148 .454 12.Geneva.............. 10 274 593 .462 13.Tiffin.............. 18 478 1019 .469 14.Rio Grande.......... 18 524 1113 .471 15.Urbana.............. 18 547 1121 .488 16.Houghton............ 10 294 592 .497 3-POINT FIELD GOAL PERCENTAGES ## Team G FG FGA Pct --------------------------------------------- 1.Notre Dame.......... 10 71 164 .433 2.Ohio Dominican...... 18 81 202 .401 3.Mt. Vernon Nazarene. 18 141 363 .388 4.Walsh............... 18 138 363 .380 5.Houghton............ 10 94 249 .378 6.Malone.............. 18 134 362 .370 7.Daemen.............. 10 85 233 .365 8.Geneva.............. 10 65 179 .363 9.Shawnee State....... 18 98 273 .359 10.Wilberforce......... 18 92 264 .348 11.Cedarville.......... 18 163 477 .342 12.Rio Grande.......... 18 127 382 .332 13.Roberts Wesleyan.... 10 53 162 .327 14.Point Park.......... 10 54 169 .320 15.Tiffin.............. 18 68 246 .276 16.Urbana.............. 18 121 446 .271 3-POINT FIELD GOAL PCT DEFENSE ## Team G FG FGA Pct --------------------------------------------- 1.Ohio Dominican...... 18 113 360 .314 2.Mt. Vernon Nazarene. 18 116 369 .314 3.Walsh............... 18 89 273 .326 4.Rio Grande.......... 18 111 338 .328 5.Notre Dame.......... 10 77 231 .333 6.Cedarville.......... 18 107 317 .338 7.Point Park.......... 10 95 265 .358 8.Wilberforce......... 18 123 343 .359 9.Tiffin.............. 18 118 329 .359 10.Houghton............ 10 55 153 .359 11.Shawnee State....... 18 127 352 .361 12.Urbana.............. 18 113 307 .368 13.Daemen.............. 10 52 140 .371 14.Malone.............. 18 146 390 .374 15.Roberts Wesleyan.... 10 77 198 .389 16.Geneva.............. 10 66 169 .391 REBOUNDING OFFENSE ## Team G Reb Avg/G -------------------------------------- 1.Cedarville.......... 18 836 46.4 2.Point Park.......... 10 427 42.7 3.Mt. Vernon Nazarene. 18 709 39.4 4.Rio Grande.......... 18 697 38.7 5.Roberts Wesleyan.... 10 378 37.8 6.Notre Dame.......... 10 375 37.5 7.Walsh............... 18 669 37.2 8.Geneva.............. 10 366 36.6 9.Shawnee State....... 18 656 36.4 10.Malone.............. 18 642 35.7 Urbana.............. 18 642 35.7 12.Tiffin.............. 18 636 35.3 13.Wilberforce......... 18 629 34.9 14.Daemen.............. 10 342 34.2 15.Ohio Dominican...... 18 613 34.1 16.Houghton............ 10 330 33.0 REBOUNDING DEFENSE ## Team G Reb Avg/G -------------------------------------- 1.Shawnee State....... 18 603 33.5 2.Walsh............... 18 620 34.4 3.Point Park.......... 10 345 34.5 4.Notre Dame.......... 10 347 34.7 5.Geneva.............. 10 351 35.1 6.Ohio Dominican...... 18 640 35.6 7.Tiffin.............. 18 642 35.7 8.Mt. Vernon Nazarene. 18 653 36.3 9.Wilberforce......... 18 664 36.9 10.Malone.............. 18 674 37.4 11.Houghton............ 10 377 37.7 12.Cedarville.......... 18 704 39.1 13.Roberts Wesleyan.... 10 392 39.2 14.Daemen.............. 10 406 40.6 15.Rio Grande.......... 18 749 41.6 16.Urbana.............. 18 780 43.3 REBOUNDING MARGIN ## Team G TEAM Avg OPP Avg Margin -------------------------------------------------------- 1.Point Park.......... 10 427 42.7 345 34.5 +8.2 2.Cedarville.......... 18 836 46.4 704 39.1 +7.3 3.Mt. Vernon Nazarene. 18 709 39.4 653 36.3 +3.1 4.Shawnee State....... 18 656 36.4 603 33.5 +2.9 5.Notre Dame.......... 10 375 37.5 347 34.7 +2.8 6.Walsh............... 18 669 37.2 620 34.4 +2.7 7.Geneva.............. 10 366 36.6 351 35.1 +1.5 8.Tiffin.............. 18 636 35.3 642 35.7 -0.3 9.Roberts Wesleyan.... 10 378 37.8 392 39.2 -1.4 10.Ohio Dominican...... 18 613 34.1 640 35.6 -1.5 11.Malone.............. 18 642 35.7 674 37.4 -1.8 12.Wilberforce......... 18 629 34.9 664 36.9 -1.9 13.Rio Grande.......... 18 697 38.7 749 41.6 -2.9 14.Houghton............ 10 330 33.0 377 37.7 -4.7 15.Daemen.............. 10 342 34.2 406 40.6 -6.4 16.Urbana.............. 18 642 35.7 780 43.3 -7.7 BLOCKED SHOTS ## Team G Blocks Avg/G ----------------------------------------- 1.Mt. Vernon Nazarene. 18 109 6.06 2.Cedarville.......... 18 85 4.72 3.Geneva.............. 10 43 4.30 4.Houghton............ 10 34 3.40 5.Daemen.............. 10 32 3.20 6.Notre Dame.......... 10 29 2.90 7.Urbana.............. 18 50 2.78 Malone.............. 18 50 2.78 9.Shawnee State....... 18 49 2.72 10.Point Park.......... 10 26 2.60 11.Wilberforce......... 18 46 2.56 12.Ohio Dominican...... 18 45 2.50 13.Rio Grande.......... 18 44 2.44 14.Walsh............... 18 36 2.00 Roberts Wesleyan.... 10 20 2.00 16.Tiffin.............. 18 35 1.94 ASSISTS ## Team G Assists Avg/G ------------------------------------------ 1.Mt. Vernon Nazarene. 18 277 15.39 2.Point Park.......... 10 153 15.30 3.Geneva.............. 10 149 14.90 4.Roberts Wesleyan.... 10 148 14.80 5.Cedarville.......... 18 266 14.78 6.Ohio Dominican...... 18 265 14.72 7.Walsh............... 18 255 14.17 8.Houghton............ 10 140 14.00 Urbana.............. 18 252 14.00 10.Daemen.............. 10 138 13.80 11.Notre Dame.......... 10 135 13.50 12.Rio Grande.......... 18 232 12.89 13.Wilberforce......... 18 231 12.83 14.Tiffin.............. 18 226 12.56 15.Malone.............. 18 217 12.06 16.Shawnee State....... 18 188 10.44 STEALS ## Team G Steals Avg/G ----------------------------------------- 1.Daemen.............. 10 113 11.30 2.Point Park.......... 10 94 9.40 3.Rio Grande.......... 18 169 9.39 4.Wilberforce......... 18 165 9.17 5.Urbana.............. 18 150 8.33 6.Tiffin.............. 18 149 8.28 7.Roberts Wesleyan.... 10 74 7.40 8.Shawnee State....... 18 128 7.11 9.Malone.............. 18 117 6.50 10.Walsh............... 18 114 6.33 Ohio Dominican...... 18 114 6.33 Mt. Vernon Nazarene. 18 114 6.33 13.Geneva.............. 10 57 5.70 14.Cedarville.......... 18 102 5.67 15.Houghton............ 10 56 5.60 16.Notre Dame.......... 10 55 5.50 TURNOVER MARGIN ## Team G TEAM Avg OPP Avg Margin -------------------------------------------------------- 1.Daemen.............. 10 148 14.8 207 20.7 +5.90 2.Rio Grande.......... 18 280 15.6 321 17.8 +2.28 3.Walsh............... 18 219 12.2 257 14.3 +2.11 4.Urbana.............. 18 216 12.0 251 13.9 +1.94 5.Wilberforce......... 18 317 17.6 333 18.5 +0.89 6.Ohio Dominican...... 18 238 13.2 249 13.8 +0.61 7.Point Park.......... 10 137 13.7 143 14.3 +0.60 8.Roberts Wesleyan.... 10 157 15.7 152 15.2 -0.50 9.Malone.............. 18 238 13.2 222 12.3 -0.89 10.Houghton............ 10 153 15.3 141 14.1 -1.20 11.Tiffin.............. 18 301 16.7 278 15.4 -1.28 12.Mt. Vernon Nazarene. 18 243 13.5 215 11.9 -1.56 13.Shawnee State....... 18 304 16.9 271 15.1 -1.83 14.Cedarville.......... 18 271 15.1 230 12.8 -2.28 15.Notre Dame.......... 10 142 14.2 118 11.8 -2.40 16.Geneva.............. 10 160 16.0 136 13.6 -2.40 ASSIST/TURNOVER RATIO ## Team G Asst Avg Turn Avg Ratio -------------------------------------------------------- 1.Urbana.............. 18 252 14.0 216 12.0 1.17 2.Walsh............... 18 255 14.2 219 12.2 1.16 3.Mt. Vernon Nazarene. 18 277 15.4 243 13.5 1.14 4.Point Park.......... 10 153 15.3 137 13.7 1.12 5.Ohio Dominican...... 18 265 14.7 238 13.2 1.11 6.Cedarville.......... 18 266 14.8 271 15.1 0.98 7.Notre Dame.......... 10 135 13.5 142 14.2 0.95 8.Roberts Wesleyan.... 10 148 14.8 157 15.7 0.94 9.Daemen.............. 10 138 13.8 148 14.8 0.93 10.Geneva.............. 10 149 14.9 160 16.0 0.93 11.Houghton............ 10 140 14.0 153 15.3 0.92 12.Malone.............. 18 217 12.1 238 13.2 0.91 13.Rio Grande.......... 18 232 12.9 280 15.6 0.83 14.Tiffin.............. 18 226 12.6 301 16.7 0.75 15.Wilberforce......... 18 231 12.8 317 17.6 0.73 16.Shawnee State....... 18 188 10.4 304 16.9 0.62 OFFENSIVE REBOUNDS ## Team G No. Avg/G --------------------------------------- 1.Cedarville.......... 18 266 14.78 2.Point Park.......... 10 144 14.40 3.Roberts Wesleyan.... 10 137 13.70 4.Rio Grande.......... 18 238 13.22 5.Urbana.............. 18 235 13.06 6.Wilberforce......... 18 227 12.61 Tiffin.............. 18 227 12.61 8.Shawnee State....... 18 226 12.56 9.Daemen.............. 10 125 12.50 10.Walsh............... 18 220 12.22 11.Geneva.............. 10 122 12.20 12.Mt. Vernon Nazarene. 18 219 12.17 13.Malone.............. 18 210 11.67 14.Houghton............ 10 112 11.20 15.Notre Dame.......... 10 107 10.70 16.Ohio Dominican...... 18 185 10.28 DEFENSIVE REBOUNDS ## Team G No. Avg/G --------------------------------------- 1.Cedarville.......... 18 570 31.67 2.Point Park.......... 10 283 28.30 3.Mt. Vernon Nazarene. 18 490 27.22 4.Notre Dame.......... 10 268 26.80 5.Rio Grande.......... 18 459 25.50 6.Walsh............... 18 449 24.94 7.Geneva.............. 10 244 24.40 8.Roberts Wesleyan.... 10 241 24.10 9.Malone.............. 18 432 24.00 10.Shawnee State....... 18 430 23.89 11.Ohio Dominican...... 18 428 23.78 12.Tiffin.............. 18 409 22.72 13.Urbana.............. 18 407 22.61 14.Wilberforce......... 18 402 22.33 15.Houghton............ 10 218 21.80 16.Daemen.............. 10 217 21.70 3-POINT FIELD GOALS MADE ## Team G 3FG Avg/G --------------------------------------- 1.Houghton............ 10 94 9.40 2.Cedarville.......... 18 163 9.06 3.Daemen.............. 10 85 8.50 4.Mt. Vernon Nazarene. 18 141 7.83 5.Walsh............... 18 138 7.67 6.Malone.............. 18 134 7.44 7.Notre Dame.......... 10 71 7.10 8.Rio Grande.......... 18 127 7.06 9.Urbana.............. 18 121 6.72 10.Geneva.............. 10 65 6.50 11.Shawnee State....... 18 98 5.44 12.Point Park.......... 10 54 5.40 13.Roberts Wesleyan.... 10 53 5.30 14.Wilberforce......... 18 92 5.11 15.Ohio Dominican...... 18 81 4.50 16.Tiffin.............. 18 68 3.78